Nonverbal means of emotions
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32782/2617-3921.2021.19.135-142Keywords:
emotion, nonverbal, paralinguistic, kinetic, phonic, proxemicAbstract
Anthropocentric paradigm of modern linguistics is characterized by an increased interest in the problems of language and speech representation of emotions. Emotions play a vey important role in cognition of the world and its understanding. Emotions are not yet a form of cognition, but they cause certain experiences in the human’s mind, that is, the experience of his attitude to himself, to reality, to cognition and activity. It is a specific, unique form of cognition, reflection and evaluation of the surrounding reality by an individual. The attitude of certain objects to the existence of a person as a natural and social being, to his needs and aspirations and individual’s attitude to them is reflected in emotions. The research of emotions is impossible without a comprehensive analysis of nonverbal behavior as biologically determined system, which is an integral part of the process of communication. There are at least two semiotic planes of emotions - verbal, representing the linguistic expression of emotions and nonverbal representing physiological manifestation of emotions. All human interaction with the environment has a certain emotional coloring. Emotions are naturally included in the communication between people. This emotional attitude accompanying verbal expression, forms nonverbal aspects of information exchange – non-verbal communication. The peculiarity of the elements of nonverbal communication is that they are formed earlier than the verbal part of the utterance, which is superimposed on the previously expressed nonverbal part. Different kinds of relationships can develop between verbal and nonverbal components. As a rule, the emotional context of speech, followed by paralinguistic component is identical to its logical sense and greatly enhances it. The main nonverbal means of expressing emotions are kinetic, phonic, graphic and proxemic.
References
Богданов В.В. Речевое общение: прагматические и семантические аспекты. Ленинград : Ленин. гос. унт, 1990. 88 с.
Горелов И.Н. Невербальные компоненты коммуникации. Москва : ЛИБРОКОМ, 2009. 112 с.
Жельвис В.И. Эмотивный аспект речи. Психолингвистическая интерпретация речевого воздействия : учебное пособие. Ярославль : ЯГПИ им. К.Д. Ушинского, 1990. 81 с.
Колшанский Г.В. Паралингвистика. Москва : Едиториал УРСС, 2010. 96 с.
Крейдлин Г.Е., Григорьева С.А., Григорьев Н.В. Словарь языка русских жестов. Москва – Вена : Языки русской культуры ; Венский славистический альманах, 2001. С. 166–248.
Морозов В.П. Акустический язык эмоций в жизни и науке. Язык эмоций, мозг и компьютер: вычислительная техника и ее применение. Москва :
Знание, 1989. № 9. С. 3–18.
Мягкова Е.Ю. Эмоциональная нагрузка слова: опыт психолингвистического исследования. 2010. 212 с.
Рюкле Х. Ваше тайное оружие в общении. Мимика, жест, движение. Москва : Интерэксперт, 1996. 246 с.
Филимонова О.Е. Эмоциология текста. Анализ репрезентации эмоций в английском тексте : учебное пособие. Санкт-Петербург : Книжный Дом, 2007. 448 с.
Шаховский В.И. О лингвистике эмоций. Язык и эмоции : сборник научных трудов. Волгоград : Перемена, 1995. С. 3–15.
Ekman P., Frisen W.V. Unmasking the Face: A Guide to Recognizing Emotions from Facial Expressions. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, 1975. 212 p.
Henley N.M. Gender as Culture: Difference and Dominance in Nonverbal Behavior : Perspectives, Applications, Intercultural insights. Lewinston, 1984. P. 351–371.
Janigová S. Speech-acts focus of dynamic equivalence in legal translation. SKASE Journal of Translation and Interpretation. 2011. Vol. 5. № 1. Р. 65–78.
O’Driscoll C., Laing J., Mason O. Cognitive emotion regulation strategies, alexithymia, and dissociation in schizophrenia: a review and meta-analysis. Clin. Psychol. Rev. 2014. № 34. P. 482–495.