Representation of the toxic image of politicians in the media space of the USA, Great Britain and Ukraine

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32782/2617-3921.2021.20.178-191

Keywords:

representation, toxic image politician, media space, verbal, nonverbal, extralingual, the USA, Great Britain, Ukraine, culturally specific, common

Abstract

The article attempts to define culturally specific features of the representation of the toxic image of politicians in the media space of the United States, Great Britain and Ukraine. The object of research are media discourses of the United States, Great Britain and Ukraine; the subject of analysis are culturally specific (verbal, nonverbal, extralingual) forms of expressing toxicity as components of the image of modern American, British and Ukrainian politicians. Toxic image means such an emotionally colored image of a politician in the media, whose behavior and statements are aimed at discriminating against the addressee and are the result of the perception of such a politician usually by members of the opposite socio-political group. Verbal forms of expressing toxicity (verbal toxins) include racist, nationalist, xenophobic, sexist and other discriminatory (divisive) statements that degrade the personality of a political opponent and cause him or her psychological harm and/or damage their image. Non-verbal forms of expressing toxicity are divided into prosodic and gesturalmimic forms, which include aggressive, caustic, humiliatingly paternalistic, snobbish tone of speech, gestures that violate the personal boundaries of the interlocutor, exaggerated facial expressions. Extralingual forms include colors, symbols, clothing, location, selection of music, etc., which exacerbate the damaging effect of the actions/statements of a politician who is labelled as toxic in the media. Culturally specific features of the representation of the toxic image of modern American, British and Ukrainian politicians are determined by the relevant information agendas for each of the countries: the electoral struggle of Trump vs. Biden (USA), withdrawal from the European Union (Great Britain), fight against corruption (Ukraine). Common to the three discourses is the aggressive-emotional type of toxic politicians, whose speeches are characterized as causing psychological harm to the opponent through direct insult, the use of impulsive movements of hands, head, body, exaggerated facial expressions and a tendency to dramatization.

References

Еременко Е.Д. Порно как токсичный контент. Studia Culturae. 2013. № 15. С. 75–81.

Ковалевська А.В. Нейтралізація патогенних дискурсів : стратегія спростування. Наукові записки Вінницького державного педагогічного університету імені Михайла Коцюбинського. Серія: Філологія. 2020. Випуск 31. С. 132–141. DOI: 10.24919/2308-4863/34-2-24.

Москвин Д. Визуальные репрезентации в политике и перспективы визуальных методов исследований в политической науке. Символическая политика. 2012. 1. С. 81–84.

Сальникова Е.В. Феномен визуальности и эволюция визуальной культуры : дис. … доктора культурологических наук: 24.00.01. Москва, 2012. 675 с.

Шкворченко Н. Токсичные информационные контенты в политической коммуникации США, Великобритании и Украины. Knowledge, Education, Law, Management. 2021. 3 (39) 2. P. 121–126.

Шкворченко Н.М. Токсичний політичний дискурс у США й Україні: когнітивно-дискурсивні контрасти. Записки з романо-германської філології. 2021. Випуск 1 (46). С. 127–134.

Шкворченко Н.Н. Токсичные вербальные контенты в политических дискурсах США, Великобритании и Украины. Proceedings of the 11th International scientific and practical conference. Perfect Publishing. Toronto, Canada. 2021. P. 436–440.

Шкворченко Н.Н. Невербальные маркеры токсичности в публичном дискурсе политиков США, Великобритании и Украины (аудиовизуальный анализ). Proceedings of the II International Scientific and Practical Conference “Scientific Practice: Modern and Classical Research Methods”, October 15, 2021. Boston, USA. P. 108–109. DOI 10.36074/logos-15.10.2021.30 URL: https://ojs.ukrlogos.in.ua/index.php/logos/article/view/15443/13934

Coleman P.T. The Way Out: How to Overcome Toxic Polarization. New York, NY: Columbia University Press. 2021. 296 p.

Dorrian M. Writing on the image: architecture, the city and the politics of representation. London, England: I.B. Tauris, 2019. 266 p.

Pavlíková M., Šenkýřová B., Drmola J. Propaganda and Disinformation Go Online. Challenging Online Propaganda and Disinformation in the 21st Century. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2021. 273 p.

Shkvorchenko, N., Cherniaieva, I., & Petlyuchenko, N. Linguistic approaches and modern communication technologies in political discourses in Europe and the USA (contrastive aspect). Cuestiones Políticas. 2021.39(70), 821–837. https://doi.org/10.46398/cuestpol.3970.49

Stefani, E., Marco, D. Language, Gesture, and Emotional Communication: An Embodied View of Social Interaction. Frontiers in Psychology. 24 September 2019. URL: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02063/full 14. Steffan, D. Visual politics: investigating the visual communication strategies of political parties and candidates from a longitudinal and comparative perspective. Baden-Baden: Nomos, 2021. 116 p.

Tirrell, L. Toxic Speech: Toward an Epidemiology of Discursive Harm. Philosophical Topics. 2017.45 (2). P. 139–161.

Wicker, B., Keysers, C., Plailly, J., Royet, J.P., Gallese, V., and Rizzolatti, G. Both of us disgusted in my insula: the common neural basis of seeing and feeling disgust. 2003. Neuron 40, 655–664. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0896-6273(03)00679-2

Published

2021-12-20