Manifestations of academic dishonesty during online learning
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32782/2617-3921.2025.27.373-380Keywords:
distance learning, cheating, plagiarism, ethical principles, moral normsAbstract
Our society is constantly experiencing changes, some positive some negative, which inevitably affects us. Education is of paramount importance in our lives. In recent years, it has been significantly transformed by certain events, taking on new forms. Initially, the coronavirus pandemic forced teachers and students at all levels of education to adapt quickly to online or distance learning.To be fair, we should mention that some distance learning was used before to support education, but its current scale of application is unprecedented. Due to Russia’s full-scale war in Ukraine, thousands of Ukrainian students were forced to move to other cities or countries, and many universities in hotspot areas are unable at this time to continue even distance learning. Online education has traditionally been viewed as an alternative pathway, particularly well-suited for those seeking opportunities to pursue higher education.The study of the comparison between the strengths and weaknesses of online learning and traditional methods of teaching is crucial in order to understand the constantly evolving educational landscape. This article studies the advantages and disadvantages of both approaches to identify the major challenges educators face during the teaching process in today’s world, particularly the causes and scale of academic dishonesty which may arise in the current student environment, as well as possible ways to prevent it. The aim of the study is to determine the ethical principles and rules guiding participants in the educational process, to explore the relationship between students’ motivation and their propensity for dishonest behaviour. The study results include an analysis of the causes and types of academic dishonesty. Learning a foreign language online is examined in relation to the specifics of distance education, whose primary characteristics include the network-based interaction of all participants in the educational process and a comparatively greater emphasis on independent work. In conclusion, the authors underline the importance of fostering a culture of integrity, reorienting moral standards and addressing the root causes of dishonesty.
References
Демидчук Л. Причини та прояв дій з академічної недоброчесності в закладах освіти. Підприємництво та логістика в умовах сучасних викликів : матеріали ІІ Міжнар. наук.-практ. конф. [Тернопіль, 26-28 трав. 2022 р.]. Тернопіль : ЗУНУ, 2022. С. 225–229.
Демуз І. Академічна недоброчесність та шляхи її подолання 2021. URL: https://undiasd.archives.gov.ua/img/2021/2021_01_11/2021_01_11_demuz.pdf (дата звернення: 16.01.2025).
Закон України «Про освіту». від 05.09.2017. Стаття 42 URL: https://gor1.licey.org.ua/stattya-42-zakonu-ukraini-pro-osvitu-12-57-15-27-02=2024 (дата звернення: 08.12.2024).
Колодяжна А. В. Академічна недоброчесність у вищій школі. Академічна доброчесність: виклики сучасності. Збірник наукових есе учасників дистанційного етапу наукового стажування для освітян (Республіка Польща, Варшава, 27.06.2022–05.08.2022). URL: https://er.knutd.edu.ua/bitstr eam/123456789/22963/1/131-134.pdf (дата звернення: 15.01.2025).
Марушкевич А. Академічна недоброчесність. Вісник Київського національного університету імені Тараса Шевченка, Серія: Педагогіка, Вип. 1(17), 2023. С. 77.
Полоз А., Хоменко В. Академічна недоброчесність у вищій освіті. 2020 URL: https://osvita.in/ua/akademichna-nedobrochesnist-u-vishhij-osviti/ (дата звернення: 16.01.2025).
Фалалєєва Л. Г. Захист основоположних прав у інтеграційному правопорядку Європейського Союзу: монографія. Київ: ФОП Кандиба Т. П., 2020. 455 с.
Штепура А. П. Професійна підготовка майбутніх учителів англійської мови засобами дистанційного навчання в університетах Республіки Польща. Вісник Ніжинського державного університету імені М.Гоголя, No 2(16), 2024. С. 45–68. URL: http://lib.ndu.edu.ua/dspace/handle/ 123456789/3864 (дата звернення: 02.12.2024).
Faculty Tutorial: Academic Dishonesty Definition and Types. URL: https://www.niu.edu/academic-integrity/faculty/types/index.shtml (дата звернення: 30.11.2024).
Higher education Collaborative solutions for higher education challenges. URL: https://www.jisc.ac.uk/higher-education (дата звернення: 21.12.2024).
Hodges C., Moore S., Lockee B., Trust T., Bond A. The Difference between Emergency Remote Teaching and Online Learning [Internet]. Educause Review. 2020 URL: https://er.educause.edu/articles/2020/3/the-difference-between-emergency-remote-teaching-and-online-learning (accessed 17.07.2024).
Lunn E., Verkhovtsova O., Ishchenko O. Assessing language learning outcomes in online environments. Studies in Comparative Education, (2), 2024. Р. 25–33. URL: https://doi.org/10.31499/2306-5532.2.2024.319847 (accessed 17.12.2024).