MONOLINGUALISM AND ITS HERITAGE

Authors

  • A. Cehan «Alexandru Ioan Cuza» University

Keywords:

monolingualism, foreign language, Direct/Natural method, Reform Movement, TEFL

Abstract

The paper looks at the tradition of monolingualism in the teaching of English as a foreign language, the contribution of the precursors of the Reform Movement and that of the members of the Reform Movement to the success and practical applications (the Direct/ Natural method), and tries to disclose its current manifestations in TEFL.

References

Banathy Beka. H., Sawyer J. O. «The Primacy of Speech: An Historical Sketch». The Modern Language Journal 53, No. 8 (Dec., 1969): 537–544.

Berlitz London. 2011. Berlitz Training and Methodology. Available: www.berlitz.co.uk/upload/pdfs/Berlitz_Instruction_methodology_WEBSITE.pdf.

Brown H. D. Teaching by Principles: An Interactive Approach to Language Pedagogy, 2nd edn. New York: Addison Wesley Longman Inc, 2001.

Cehan D. A. English Triangle. Bucureşti: MatrixRom, 2014.

Collins English Dictionary - Complete & Unabridged. 2012. Digital Edition © William Collins Sons & Co. Ltd. 1979, 1986 © HarperCollins Publishers 1998, 2000, 2003, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2009, 2012.

Davies A. «Communicative competence as language use». Applied Linguistics 10 (1989): 157–70.

Howatt A.P.R. A history of English language teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1984.

Rajagopalan K. «Linguistics and the myth of nativity: comments on the controversy over «new/non-native» Englishes». Journal of Pragmatics 27 (1997): 225–31.

Richards Jack C., Rodgers, Theodore S. Approaches and Methods in Language Teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1986.

Wilkins D. A. Notional Syllabuses. London: Oxford University Press, 1976.

Downloads

Published

2018-10-05