The peculiarities of political discourse interpreting

Abstract

Political discourse interpreting is a complex and multifaceted field requiring a deep understanding of the socio-political context and its intricacies. The proposed article explores the peculiarities of political discourse interpreting, shedding light on the unique challenges faced by interpreters. Using various linguistic methods, this research delves into the comparative analysis of source language messages and corresponding target language ones to uncover similarities and differences in conveying politically embedded meanings. Furthermore, the article highlights the significance of the interpreter’s role in bridging linguistic and cultural gaps, facilitating effective interaction between speakers and listeners. The conducted analysis reveals that political discourse involves the use of persuasive rhetoric, evocative lexical items, and stylistic devices. Political figures frequently employ political language and discourse to shape public opinion, evoke emotional responses, and effectively convey their messages. The research results demonstrate that political language often employs indirect meanings, leaving certain information unexpressed explicitly. Consequently, the interpreter’s expertise and skills in deciphering implicit information and conveying it appropriately in the target language become crucial. Moreover, the study highlights the significance of political terminology in shaping the audience’s worldviews, often carrying negative connotations. Stylistic devices such as hyperbole, irony, and mockery are commonly employed in political discourse to enhance imagery and rhetorical impact. Thus, interpreters must consider the broader context, encompassing the political atmosphere and specific events, in order to accurately capture the underlying connotations and implications of political statements.