Anger emotion verbalization in English and Ukrainian ethnocultures
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32782/2617-3921.2023.24.165-177Keywords:
anger emotion, verbalization, English and Ukrainian, ethnoculture, anthropocentric paradigm, common and distinctive characteristics, comparison.Abstract
Contemporary linguistics is characterized by a thorough study of human emotions, which are inseparably connected with our everyday lives as well as our everyday activities. Anger belongs to one of the basic human emotions, and with the emergence of a new humanistic anthropocentric linguistic paradigm that pays more attention to the speaker and his/her psychology, linguists began to refer to the emotions in their works more often and started having a particular interest in them. Although lexical units remain the main means of anger verbalization, in both English and Ukrainian there are many other ways to express the emotion of anger. Each language has its own specific patterns of anger expression, developed due to the peculiarities of culture, etiquette and mentality of different ethnic groups. The present paper focuses on anger emotion verbalization by means of direct nomination, invectives, curses, exclamations, irony and sarcasm in both English and Ukrainian ethnocultures, depending on its components, types, causes and consequences, which differ, but also possess certain common characteristics in the languages under study. The main common feature of anger is that it is a strong, negative emotion, often having destructive consequences both for the one to whom it is directed, and for the one who feels it. It is natural for humans to express their emotions regardless of their nationality, age, sex, educational background, etc. However, the very forms of doing so, their meaning and direction have notable features and specificities in each individual culture. Representatives of different ethnicities do not always feel the same emotions in similar circumstances and situations, and as a result, emotional reactions and conditions that are natural to one nation may seem strange to the other one. This cultural peculiarity also affects communication. Metaphors, idioms and phraseological units are often used in both English and Ukrainian to express various kinds of anger. The author dwells on all possible expressive means and stylistic devices to highlight their both role and function in anger emotion verbalization. The abovementioned language units are used in English and Ukrainian by their language bearers to pay regard to the external manifestations of internal experiences, to their assessment in terms of nonverbal communication as well as observing norms and rules of behaviour in corresponding societies. At the physiological level, the central organ associated with feelings is the heart, which on the spiritual level corresponds to the human soul. Negative and positive emotions are represented metaphorically by their comparison with the animal world, everyday realities and, especially in Ukrainian culture, with religious and demonic images. In this respect, much attention is paid to the analysis of different ways of anger emotion verbalization in English and Ukrainian and, correspondingly, in English and Ukrainian ethnocultures.
References
Вечірко Р. М. Українська та зарубіжна культура: навч.-метод. посіб. / Р. М. Вечірко, О. М. Семашко та ін. К.: КНЕУ, 2003. 367 с.
Дюськіна А. Фразеологізми на позначення емоцій як засіб вираження українського менталітету/ Наукові записки Вінницького державного педагогічного університету імені Михайла Коцюбинського. Серія : Філологія (мовознавство). 2012. Вип. 16. С. 128–131.
Kövecses Z. Metaphors of Anger, Pride, and Love: A Lexical Approach to the Structure of Concepts. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company, 1986. 147 p.
Lakoff G., Johnson M. Metaphors we live by. London: The University of Chicago Press, 2003. 276 p.
Reddy W.M. Against Constructionism: The Historical Ethnography of Emotions. Current Anthropology, 1997. P. 327–351.
Russell J. A., Fernández-Dols J. M., Wellenkamp J. S. Everyday Conceptions of Emotion: An Introduction to the Psychology, Anthropology and Linguistics of Emotion. Almagro: Springer Science & Business Media, 2013. 585 p.
Wierzbicka A. Semantics, Culture and Cognition. Universal Human Concepts in Culture Specific Configurations. N. Y.: Oxford University Press, 1992. 487 p.
Wierzbicka A. A response to Michael Bamberg // The Language of Emotions. Conceptualization, Expression, and Theoretical Foundation. Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company, 1997. P. 227–232.
LEXICOGRAPHICAL SOURCES
Cambridge Dictionary Online – [Електронний ресурс] – Режим доступу: https://dictionary.cambridge.org/
Longman Dictionary of Contemporary English Online – [Електронний ресурс] – Режим доступу: https://www.ldoceonline.com/
Merriam-Webster's Learner's Dictionary – [Електронний ресурс] – Режим доступу: https://learnersdictionary.com/
Oxford Dictionary Online – [Електронний ресурс] – Режим доступу:
http://www.oxforddictionaries.com/
Shakespeare's Insults: A Pragmatic Dictionary / Nathalie Vienne-Guerrin. – London: Bloomsbury Publishing, 2016. 512 p.
The Oxford Thesaurus: An A-Z Dictionary of Synonyms / Laurence Urdang. – Oxford University Press1991. 1042 p.
Академічний тлумачний словник української мови – [Електронний ресурс] – Режим доступу: http://sum.in.ua/
Фразеологічний словник української мови [уклад. В. М. Білоноженко]. К. : Наук, думка, 1993. 984 с.