Morphological and syntactic identification of clauses of universal concession in British National Corpus

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32782/2617-3921.2022.21-22.222-237

Keywords:

clause of concession, universal concession, concessive action, morphology of concessive conjunction, syntactic type of sentence, corpus linguistics, tag restriction, collocation options

Abstract

The article investigates morphological and syntactic organization of English sentences of universal concession in modern English fiction dramatic, prose and verse texts of the British National Corpus. In the context of the studied sentences identification with the semantics of concessive action, the main attention is focused on generalization of morphological and syntactic characteristics of universal sentences of concession with the verification of their statistical data implementation in the modern English corpus. It has been found out that in the fiction texts of the British National Corpus English sentences of universal concession are actualized in four syntactic types of sentences: in simple, compound, complex, and cohesive types, where the concessive action clause is introduced by various types of conjunctions such as though, even though, although; in any case, in spite of; yet … (al)though etc. with / without punctuation for the cohesive type. Morphological features of means of syntactic connection are defined in three types of clauses of concession with hypotactic, paratactic, cohesive conjunction coherence in the morphological configuration as: “simple means of connection – conjunctions or adverbs”, “complex or composite means of connection – prepositional phrases”, “correlative means of connection – correlative conjunctions or disjuncts”. Seven basic morphological and syntactic subtypes of English sentences of universal concession have been identified with the syntactic description of models of concessive clauses as: finite / non-finite -ed (-ing) participial / non-finite to infinitive / nominative / prepositional / adjective / adverb clause of concession. In order to identify the structural semantic grid of the studied sentences, taking into account the corpus analysis in terms of the semantic marking tagging with the collocation [+1 Right] to the right of the conjunction of the universal concession, the quantitative indicators of nine structural and semantic types of concessive clauses are determined and calculated in the adjustment of the concessive conjunction with any verb, noun, adjectival, adverbial, conjunctive, prepositional, pronominal categorical phrase, as well as the agreement with any article and punctuation.

References

Андрушенко О.Ю. Інформаційно-структурні перетворення адитивного адверба EVEN (на матеріалі пам’яток і текстів корпусів англійської мови XII–XVII ст.). Вісник КНЛУ. Серія «Філологія». Том 24. № 1. 2021. С. 16–32.

Буніятова І.Р. Становлення складнопідрядного речення в давньогерманських мовах (ІV–XІІІ ст.) : автореф. дис. … д-ра філол. наук : 10.02.04. Київ, 2004. 37 с.

Масицька Т. Теорія залежностей у сучасному синтаксисі. Волинь філологічна: текст і контекст. 2012. Вип. 14. С. 133–144.

Ніколайчук А.С. Історія паратактичних і гіпотактичних конструкцій у мовознавстві 70-х рр. XX – початку XXI ст. Закарпатські філологічні студії. 2019. № 10(2). С. 14–18.

Селіванова О.О. Сучасна лінгвістика: напрями та проблеми. Полтава : Довкілля-К, 2008. 712 с.

Тугай О.М. Типологічна парадигма концесивних клауз у сучасному фентезійному просторі. Нова філологія. № 85, 2022. С. 283–291.

Шевченко Л.І. Модерні напрями сучасної лінгвістики: функціональний контекст. Актуальні проблеми української лінгвістики: теорія і практика. 2018. № 35. С. 7–18.

BNC Web at Lancaster University. URL: http://bncweb.lancs.ac.uk/ (last дата звернення: 25.08.2022).

Bober N., Kapranov Y., Kukarina A., Tron T., Nasalevych T. British National Corpus in English language teaching of university students. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research. June 2021. Vol. 20, No. 6. P. 174–193.

Brown K., Miller J. Concise Encyclopedia of Grammatical categories. Oxford : Elsevier. 1999. 485 p.

Buniyatova I. Elimination of grammatical redundancy in the history of English: The case of negative constructions. Studies in linguistics, anglophone literature and cultures: Studies in the evolution of the English language. 2021. Vol. 32. P. 97–109.

Burton-Roberts N. Analysing sentences: An introduction to English syntax. 4th ed. Routledge : Taylor & Francis Group, 2016. 278 p.

Chung Chan, Kim Jong-Bok. Inverted English Concessive Constructions: A Construction-Based Approach. Studies in Modern Grammar, 58, 2009. P. 39–58.

Couper-Kuhlen E., Kortmann B. Cause – Condition – Concession – Contrast: Cognitive and Discourse Perspectives. Berlin, Boston : De Gruyter Mouton, 2000. 475 p.

Crevels E.I. Concession. A typological study : PhD thesis. Amsterdam : University of Amsterdam, 2000. 191 p.

Haspelmath M., König E. Concessive conditionals in the languages of Europe. / J. Van der Auwera & D.P. O’Baoill (eds.). Adverbial constructions in the languages of Europe. Berlin – New York : Mouton de Gruyter, 1998. P. 563–640.

Hengeveld K. Adverbial clauses in the language of Europe. / J. Van der Auwera & D.P. O’Baoill (eds.). Adverbial constructions in the languages of Europe. Berlin – New York : Mouton de Gruyter, 1998. P. 335–419.

Huddleston R.D., Pullum G.K. The Cambridge grammar of the English language. 5th ed. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press, 2012. 1842 p.

König E. Concessive clauses. Concise Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics. / Brown K. (ed.). Oxford : Elsevier. 2006. P. 820–824.

Kortmann B. Adverbial subordinators in the languages of Europe. / J. Van der Auwera & D.P. O’Baoill (eds.). Adverbial constructions in the languages of Europe. Berlin – New York : Mouton de Gruyter, 1998. P. 457–561.

Leech G., Svartvik J. A communicative grammar of English. 3rd ed. Routledge : Taylor & Francis Group, 2003. 304 p.

Miller J. An introduction to English syntax. Edinburgh : Edinburgh University Press. 2002. 190 P.

Mitchell B. Old English syntax. Volume II. Subordination, independent elements, and element order. Oxford : Clarendon Press, 1985. 1080 p.

Quirk R., Greenbaum S., Leech G., Svartvik J. A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London : Longman, 1985. 1779 p.

Schützler O. Although-constructions in varieties of English. World Englishes. Vol. 39. New York : John Wiley & Sons Ltd., 2020. P. 443-461.

Wälchli B. Selectives (“topic markers”) on subordinate clauses. Linguistics. 2022. 79 p.

Yan Zhang. Adversative and Concessive Conjunctions in EFL Writing: Corpus-based Description and Rhetorical Structure Analysis. 1st ed. Singapore, Shanghai : Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. & Shanghai Jiao Tong University Press, 2021. 234 p.

Published

2022-12-01